Open source · CC0 · A working draft
A community is a kind of cloth.
Pull one thread and you can feel the others move.
Commonweave is an open directory of organizations already weaving healthier communities together.
Cooperatives, mutual aid networks, community land trusts, community energy, open governance tools.
The map shows 29,422 entries with geocoded coordinates across 102 countries, drawn from a wider candidate pool of 153,426 organisations.
About this data. Commonweave pulls from 25+ public registries and thematic global networks: IRS Exempt Organizations BMF, UK Charity Commission, Australia ACNC, Brazil Mapa das OSCs, the ICA, RIPESS, Mutual Aid Hub, the Transition Network, and many more. The pipeline runs candidates through a multilingual alignment filter to keep only entries that actually embody one of the framework sections (cooperatives, mutual aid, community land trusts, food sovereignty, participatory democracy, restorative justice, and the rest). Right now
153,426 organisations have survived the filter;
29,422 of those have coordinates and appear on the map across
102 countries. Tier A is reserved for manually reviewed entries (currently empty — community auditing is open); Tier B is registry-backed; Tier C is inferred from keyword scoring and not yet reviewed.
Full methodology →
Multilingual pipeline. The scoring bots now recognise alignment terms in roughly 30 languages: Spanish
cooperativa, Portuguese
economia solidária, Japanese
協同組合, Mandarin
合作社, Arabic
تعاونية, Yoruba
egbe ajose, Quechua
ayni/minga, Amharic
የኜቀት, plus Indigenous land-commons concepts like
ejido,
waqf,
hima,
gotong-royong,
iriai-chi,
usi civici. Researcher bots build search queries in every language spoken in a country, not just English. Full term bank:
MULTILINGUAL-TERMS.md.
Data snapshot. Headline counts above are pulled at runtime from the published static export (last built
2026-04-28). The working database has since been recovered and re-verified; rebuilt totals are tracked in
README.md. Treat these numbers as a public snapshot, not a real-time count.
§ 01 · Explore
Global directory map.
Filter by section. Hover any dot for details. Scroll to zoom, drag to pan. Default view hides Tier C (inferred) candidates; flip the switch in the map sidebar to include them.
§ 02 · Sections
Ten sections, mapped.
Counts are mapped organizations per section: the points you can click on the map. Each section also has off-map candidates pending geocoding. Browse the full directory →
Healthcare
Open-source health IT, community health worker models, universal systems that demonstrably work.
6,072 organizations
Education
Open courseware, democratic schooling, offline-first platforms, 300M+ Moodle users.
3,867 organizations
Food sovereignty
Agroecology, seed sovereignty, open food networks, CSA movements, 200M peasant farmers.
3,518 organizations
Democratic infrastructure
Verifiable voting, liquid democracy, sortition, participatory platforms, citizens' assemblies.
8,698 organizations
Land & housing
Community land trusts, Vienna social housing, stewardship over speculation.
2,642 organizations
Ecological restoration
Beyond-GDP governance, regenerative ecology, watershed stewardship, biodiversity recovery.
2,274 organizations
Conflict resolution
Restorative justice, transitional justice, community accountability. Significant recidivism reduction in studied programs.
885 organizations
Cooperatives & solidarity
Worker cooperatives, mutual aid networks, community wealth building, credit unions.
1,264 organizations
Recreation & arts
Basic income for artists, open cultural heritage, freely licensed media.
127 organizations
Energy & digital commons
Community energy cooperatives, federated protocols, 900 US rural electric co-ops serving 42M.
75 organizations
§ 03 · What this is
An engineering problem, not a manifesto.
Here is a thing that is true and that almost no one talks about clearly: the machines are going to do most of the work. Not eventually. Now, and accelerating. The interesting question isn't whether that happens. It's who benefits when it does.
Right now the answer is: whoever owns the machines. That's a design choice, not a law of nature. You could design it differently.
Commonweave is an attempt to think carefully about what "differently" actually means. What systems would need to exist, how you'd build them, what's already being built, and how you get from here to there without everything going badly wrong in the middle.
The directory indexes organizations from public registries across 174 countries: community land trusts, worker cooperatives, open-source health systems, participatory democracy tools, community energy grids. Filtered to entries that actually embody pieces of the answer. That's what Paul Hawken saw in 2007. That's what this continues.
On the shoulders of WiserEarth. From 2007 to 2014, wiser.org was the only place that tried to map the civil society commons at global scale: 114,994 NGOs in 243 countries, a 381-node taxonomy, women-led, ad-free, genuinely beautiful. It closed because it depended on one organization's philanthropy. The data is mostly gone. The structural lesson is documented in
SUSTAINABILITY.md.
On the horizon: a trust-based internet. A directory is only half the problem. The other half is how aligned organisations federate, verify each other, and coordinate without routing every relationship through a central platform. The
Open Co-op's PLANET project and the
First Person Project (under
Linux Foundation Decentralized Trust) are building verifiable-identity infrastructure that could let these organisations cooperate at scale without platform capture. Commonweave's next data-model change will add an
attestations field so directory entries can eventually carry cryptographically-signed vouching from peers. Background:
OPENCOOP-RESEARCH.md.
This belongs to everyone.
The data is CC0. Fork it, extend it, add organizations, correct errors. Leadership is transparent and accountable. No personality cults, no inner circles. If you know something the directory doesn't, that's what pull requests are for.